Actually, I think “the use of the dead to the living” is a reference to a tract written by the 19th Century Utilitarian Thomas Southwood Smith — one of whose claims to fame is having been a friend of the philosopher Jeremy Bentham… The pamphlet “The Use of the Dead to the Living” suggested that the then-current system of burial in England permitted the wasteful use of bodies that he felt could otherwise be used for dissection by the medical profession.
I am not sure if there also is a second riddle via anagram, or by reference to the grave picture… However, since the grave picture also fits the pamphlet reference, I suspect not. Perhaps our 21st Century Jeremy Bentham will clarify.
I was indeed referring to Mr. Smith. Well done, kind sir.
There is no anagram in this instance; however, Mr. Smith’s concept is quite applicable and significant to certain parties with whom we are all familiar.
Thailand has 324 empty graves – after Charles WIdmore used the remains to fill a plane and drop it in the ocean.
The use of the dead to the living: cadavers for medical use – and sometimes more nefarious purposes.
Leighsa said this on July 12, 2008 at 7:19 am |
Actually, I think “the use of the dead to the living” is a reference to a tract written by the 19th Century Utilitarian Thomas Southwood Smith — one of whose claims to fame is having been a friend of the philosopher Jeremy Bentham… The pamphlet “The Use of the Dead to the Living” suggested that the then-current system of burial in England permitted the wasteful use of bodies that he felt could otherwise be used for dissection by the medical profession.
I am not sure if there also is a second riddle via anagram, or by reference to the grave picture… However, since the grave picture also fits the pamphlet reference, I suspect not. Perhaps our 21st Century Jeremy Bentham will clarify.
Monte said this on July 15, 2008 at 2:27 pm |
I was indeed referring to Mr. Smith. Well done, kind sir.
There is no anagram in this instance; however, Mr. Smith’s concept is quite applicable and significant to certain parties with whom we are all familiar.
Jeremy Bentham said this on July 15, 2008 at 2:34 pm |